Imamat 3:12
Konteks3:12 “‘If his offering is a goat he must present it before the Lord,
Imamat 8:14
Konteks8:14 Then he brought near the sin offering bull 1 and Aaron and his sons laid their hands on the head of the sin offering bull,
Imamat 10:16
Konteks10:16 Later Moses sought diligently for the sin offering male goat, 2 but it had actually been burnt. 3 So he became angry at Eleazar and Ithamar, Aaron’s remaining sons, saying,
Imamat 16:3
Konteks16:3 “In this way Aaron is to enter into the sanctuary – with a young bull 4 for a sin offering 5 and a ram for a burnt offering. 6
Imamat 16:5
Konteks16:5 He must also take 7 two male goats 8 from the congregation of the Israelites for a sin offering and one ram for a burnt offering.
[8:14] 1 sn See Lev 4:3-12 above for the sin offering of the priests. In this case, however, the blood manipulation is different because Moses, not Aaron (and his sons), is functioning as the priest. On the one hand, Aaron and his sons are, in a sense, treated as if they were commoners so that the blood manipulation took place at the burnt offering altar in the court of the tabernacle (see v. 15 below), not at the incense altar inside the tabernacle tent itself (contrast Lev 4:5-7 and compare 4:30). On the other hand, since it was a sin offering for the priests, therefore, the priests themselves could not eat its flesh (Lev 4:11-12; 6:30 [23 HT]), which was the normal priestly practice for sin offerings of commoners (Lev 6:26[19], 29[22]).
[10:16] 2 sn This is the very same male goat offered in Lev 9:15 (cf. the note on Lev 10:1 above).
[10:16] 3 tn Heb “but behold, it had been burnt” (KJV and NASB both similar).
[16:3] 4 tn Heb “with a bull, a son of the herd.”
[16:3] 5 sn See the note on Lev 4:3 regarding the term “sin offering.”
[16:3] 6 sn For the “burnt offering” see the note on Lev 1:3.
[16:5] 7 tn Heb “And he shall take.”
[16:5] 8 tn Heb “he-goats of goats”; CEV “two goats, both of them males.”
